State Demonisation of Human Nature

Loving Freely

By Jennifer Finney Boylan, Oct. 23 2015 (LINK to article)

"All of us — men and women, gay and straight, cis and trans — deserve to be loved."

I'm sure that if we ourselves love, then we will be loved back by at least some of those we love, but not necessarily straight away or even in our own lifetime.

Everyone should be free to be themselves, and it is terrible how even democratic states, until very recently, made it illegal for many people to be themselves in so far as their sexuality was concerned.

The state has always demonised certain aspects of human nature, as a means of socio-political intimidation and control. It used to be "original sin" (disobedience of divine, i.e. priestly/state authority), then human (especially female and gay) sexuality; now it is "racial prejudice", i.e. the natural human inclination - like original sin - to identity with members of one's own tribe, race or ethnic group, which was made responsible for the Holocaust and equated with the evils of Nazi racism.

It is in the very nature of the state to intimidate and control society, in order to achieve its primary purpose of facilitating its SELF-exploitation, to the personal advantage of its ruling elites and favoured (especially wealthy and academic) clients, at the expense of society at large, its well-being and long-term survival. This is why all past civilisations have fallen, as soon will ours, unless we quickly recognise the cause: http://philosopherkin.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/civilisation-evolutionary-cul-de-sac.html

America's Policy of Forced Desegregation

Ending the Cycle of Racial Isolation

By the Editorial Board Oct. 17, 2015 (LINK to editorial)

1st post 

"The Ethel Lawrence Homes subdivision validates the idea of developing affordable housing, “both as a social policy for promoting racial and class integration in metropolitan America”

What right do the authorites have to socially engineer society in this way, instead of leaving people to live in the kind of communities they prefer to live in?

This is precisely what most people hate about "socialism", the way it forces people to live according to state ideology.

Most people prefer not to live in a DIVERSE communities, but amongst people of similar race, culture and wealth as themselves.

DIVERSITY, in the form multi-racial and multicultural society, is a consequence of globalisation and mass migration, which are relatively modern phenomena, certainly on the scale that we are now experiencing them.

Why do "progressives" insist on ramming it down the throats of those who clearly don't want it?

It's because state IDEOLOGY (not coincidentally, the exact but equally extreme and insane opposite of Nazi racial ideology) says that those who are "colour-blind", love DIVERSITY and racial mixing are "morally superior" to those who don't.

It serves the age-old strategy of “divide and rule”, just as medieval church ideology once did, dividing society into a morally superior, now supposedly "colour-blind", elite and the morally inferior, naturally (human nature being what it is) less colour-blind, masses, who must submit to the authority of and domination by their "moral superiors".

2nd post

  "Affordable housing done right can be a powerful tool for improving lives"

It is also a powerful tool for implementing state racial ideology, which now serves America and other western "democracies" as an instrument of socio-political intimidation and control, just as medieval church ideology once did.  

Original sin" (disobedience of divine, i.e. priestly/state authority) has simply been replaced by "racial prejudice" (the natural human inclination - like original sin - to identity with members of one's own tribe, race or ethnic group, which was made responsible for the Holocaust and equated with the evils of Nazi racism), which only submission to priestly/academic/state ideology and authority can save us from eternal damnation for, not as heathens and heretics, as in the past, but as "bigots" and "racists".

Why has this not been recognised by the academics we look to as authorities in understanding society and the state? Because, like their medieval predecessors and counterparts, they are themselves privileged clients and employees of the state, with a massive personal self-interest (subconscious more than conscious) in rationalising and defending its role, self-image (as our "nation") and ideologies (social, political, economic and racial, formerly religious), on which the state bases its claim to moral and knowledgeable authority.

Islamophobia and Human Tribalism

With Anti-Muslim Campaign, Canada Has Its Trump Moment

By Martin Patriquin Oct. 16, 2015  (LINK to article) 


The first time I saw a Muslim woman completely covered in my local supermarket I was surprised and shocked at how angry it made me feel. Feelings I was careful not to show, of course.  In the meantime, I've got used to it, living in "post-racial multicultural" London, but it is interesting to consider WHY it made me - and clearly, makes many others - so angry.  

Man is an inherently and intensely tribal animal, although our original tribes have long disappeared, to be replaced in no small measure by the state, which claims to represent our tribe or nation, in order to command its citizens' sense of tribal belonging and loyalty, thereby legitimising itself, its ruling elites and the immense power they wield and abuse.

A woman in a burka is an affront and insult to my sense of tribal belonging, as is, in fact, although not so acutely, the whole notion of "multi-ethnic nationhood", which is an oxymoronic absurdity on a par with George Orwell's Ministries of Peace and Truth.

I have learned to deal with it by ceasing to identify with the British state as my nation, aided by the realisation that it was never a genuine nation anyway, but just a mercenary "patron state" deceitfully posing as a nation.  

I also finally recognised the method to the madness of not just the British state's creation of and commitment to post-racial multicultural society and ideology: see BLOG.

Academics Stuck in Pre-Copernican Dark Age

Our Deadened, Carbon-Soaked Seas

By Richard w. Spinrad and Ian Boyd Oct. 15, 2015 (LINK to article)

"Both the United States and Britain . . have called for strong action to reduce carbon emissions."

The trouble is that Britain and America, like other states, are committed to promoting lifestyles, lifestyle aspirations and an economy which make reducing carbon emissions to any significant extent quite impossible. 

Academic understanding of the state and socio-economic status quo is massively influenced by academics' own dependency on them both, which leads to the absurdity of the states responsible for increasing carbon emissions calling for their reduction - which isn't going to happen, for the simple reason that too much money is to be made from maintaining or increasing them. 

Social science academics are stuck in a pre-Copernican, i.e. pre-Darwinian, dark age, which they will not emerge from until they have lifted the taboo on viewing their disciplines from a human-evolutionary perspective, which is the only way to obtain a realistic view of our situation and of socio-economic reality, and which I elaborate on is this BLOG.

US Constitution Written by and for European Americans

Native Lives Matter, Too 

By Lydia Millet, Oct. 13 2015 (LINK to article)


When are Americans going to face up to the reality that is staring them in the face, of America not being a genuine nation, but a mercenary "patron state" deceitfully posing as a nation, in order to legitimise itself, its ruling elites and the immense power they wield and abuse, to their own personal advantage and that of favoured (especially wealthy and academic) "client citizens", at the expense of society at large and its numerous ethnic groupings, which represent the natural basis for genuine nationhood?

The American constitution, as Ms Millet's own reference to the Declaration of Independence makes clear, was written by and for European Americans, and no one else.

This is America's fundamental problem: pretending to be something it is not.

Until Americans face up this truth, there can be no glimmer of hope of them ever resolving their existential social and political problems, and learning to live in harmony with each other and the natural environment, which in the years ahead will tear the country apart. Better to face up the  truth now, while there is still time to resolve these problems in a rational and civilised fashion.

It is the nature of the state itself (and not just the American state) which needs to be properly understood, something which academics have not been honest with us - or themselves - about, because of their own dependency (as clients and employees) on it: On The Perverted Darwinian Nature of the State and Civilisation itself.

American Gun Culture a Symptom of Non-Nationhood

When Ronald Reagan Embraced Gun Control  

By Francis X. Clines, Oct. 8 2015 (LINK to article)

It is worth asking what America's gun culture tells us about America.

It tells us that America is not a nation, but a mercenary "patron state" deceitfully posing as a nation, in order to legitimise itself, its ruling elites and the immense power they wield and abuse, to their own personal advantage and that of favoured (especially wealthy) clients, at the expense of society at large.

When you are amongst members of your own tribe or nation, you don't need fire arms or arms of any description. You only need arms when you are amongst potential enemies, i.e. members of other tribes or nations.

Why has this not been recognised by the academics we look to as authorities in understanding society and the state?

Because they are privileged clients and employees of their respective "patron state" themselves, with a massive personal self-interest (subconscious more than conscious) in rationalising and defending its role, self-image (as a "nation") and ideologies (social, political, economic and racial, formerly religious), on which the American state bases its claim to moral and knowledgeable authority.  

My own state, Britain, isn't a genuine nation either, but like America, a mercenary "patron state". We don't have a gun culture, but there is plenty of other evidence to support my claim. But British academics too are loath to criticise their "patron state" and employer.

Jewish Anti-Semitism

Indifference Kills  

By Roger Cohn, Oct. 8 2015 (LINK to article)

There are those who argue that Jews who promote mass immigration into the West and its enabling ideology of post-racial multiculturalism are doing so in pursuit of their own ethnic self-interests, but it seems to me that quite the contrary is true; like their white non-Jewish counterparts they are in fact, Roger amongst them, acting AGAINST their own ethnic, i.e. Jewish, self-interests.  

The rise in anti-Semitic incidences in Europe is due almost entirely to Europe's increasing Muslim population.

What I see is an IDEOLOGY of racial self-denial and self-contempt on the part of both Jewish and non-Jewish whites, which serves western secular states, not least America, in which ethnic Europeans are still the dominant ethnic group, as an instrument of socio-political intimidation, rewards, punishments, manipulation and control, just as medieval church ideology once did.  

It is a modern incarnation of the age-old strategy of “divide and rule”, dividing society into a morally superior, now supposedly "colour-blind", elite and the morally inferior, naturally (human nature being what it is) less colour-blind, masses, who must submit to the authority of and domination by their "moral superiors".